|
A five-part series on traditional media in a new marketing
environment.
The ways marketers get their messages to consumers – and,
increasingly, the ways they try to get those consumers to enter into
a dialog with them and with other consumers – are changing at an
ever-accelerating pace. In fact change is about the only constant in
marketing communications today. Except, of course, for all the stuff
that remains resolutely the same. Like radio.
Part 2: Radio isn't generating a lot of buzz, but the signals are
strong.
 |
|
Will
radio keep its strength? Or are there changes ahead? |
Radio's the
same? What
about satellite? The new Arbitron ratings? Online radio? MP-3
players? Podcasts? Won't they have a massive effect? Apparently not.
-
Radio advertising revenues were up 2.8%, from $20.7 billion to
$21.3 billion in 2006, according to TNS Media Intelligence.
(However they were down 2.1% in the first quarter of 2007, when
overall ad spending dropped 0.3%).
-
Radio's 2006 share of total U.S. advertising spending inched down
from 7.4% to 7.3%. (First quarter 2007 dropped a bit more to
6.6%.)
-
Radio's 2006 weekly reach of total U.S. population 12 and older
was flat at 93% in Arbitron's "Radio Today" report.
-
Total licensed stations have grown from 13,000 in 2001 to 13,793
in 2006 according to the FCC. Compounded, that's just a smidge
over 1% a year.
What's earth-shattering about these numbers is that they're not
earth-shattering: they're up a little, down a little or unchanged.
In an era in which most other old media are experiencing wrenching
transformations, radio just keeps on keeping on. Don't they know
there's a paradigm shift occurring here?
What happened to the factors that were going to change everything?
Satellite
radio's second stage never ignited. There are a only about
12,500,000 subscribers – about 5.6% of total U.S. adults.
Those subscribers' average listening time is down from 16 hours a
week to 12.6. That diminished interest has led to a very high
attrition rate.
XM and Sirius (Soon to merge into S&X?) have to fill the pipeline
frantically because an overwhelming number of subscribers drop the
extraterrestrial services as soon as their free (or very cheap)
introductory offers expire.
In an Arbitron study only 15% of Americans expressed interest in
having satellite radio in their cars – if it was already installed.
Only 8% would even consider an aftermarket retrofit.
With the apparently irresistible impulse weak companies have to join
forces and fail together, Sirius is now being heavily promoted by
Chrysler. (Beats us why the Mopar folks think a free offer of
something nobody much wants will move metal. Sure didn't work with
their cars.)
Arbitron's
new digital ratings have made a difference, but not a big one.
With the old diaries, drivers jotted down a station when they
started out and – surprise – didn't pull over to note the change
when an especially obnoxious commercial made them hit the button.
The top stations in each market were the beneficiaries of the panel
members' tendencies to just note their default stations. The new
digital ratings capture station changes within trips, so the top
stations ratings are down a bit and the lower-ranked stations are up
a bit. But it's still a broadcast terrestrial radio audience.
Online radio
was – briefly – the hot new area of radio. There were no barriers to
entry:
-
Start-up cost was virtually nothing: there was no need for an
expensive transmitter, no studios beyond an announcer booth and
virtually no cost for on-air content.
-
There were no FCC license requirements.
-
Generating a national audience just required some skill at
creating buzz.
But the three judges of the Copyright Royalty Board may have put an
end to online radio. They've established royalty rates for online
play that will bankrupt most of the fledgling online stations.
Even if the rates are lowered and some stations survive, online
radio's audience is relatively small. Although more than a third of
all U.S. adults have listened online at least once, fewer than 5%
listen in any given week.
MP-3 Players
are changing listening patterns. Just not as quickly as
anticipated.
Bridge Ratings estimates that MP-3 players will reduce terrestrial
radio's penetration of the U.S. listening audience to 85% by 2010.
That eight-point decline would be significant.
But MP-3 players usually don't eliminate user's radio listening,
they just reduce it. Especially when the gadgets are new. When they
first get them, men under 35 and women under 30 spend up to 80% of
their audio entertainment time with their new MP-3 players (older
groups use them less). Among all age groups fatigue sets in after
six months and MP-3 usage begins a noticeable decline.
Still, with 75,000,000 MP-3 players out there in the U.S. – and more
coming every day – the technology will eventually erode terrestrial
radio's listening time. It just won't erode it that much. In fact,
77% say their terrestrial broadcast radio listening time won't
change at all despite MP-3s, online radio and satellite.
Podcasts
presently reach just 1% of the U.S. listening audience regularly
according to a Forrester Research poll. But an Arbitron study shows
that 11% listen occasionally. Most of those listening are young,
relatively affluent males.
Podcast listening is growing exponentially. It grew 398% from 2005
to 2005, and 563% from 2005 to 2006. And about one-fifth of
listeners listen at least once a week.
Most listening is on computers rather than portable MP-3 players.
The ratio is now four to one, but the growing i-Pod nation will
almost certainly shift than balance. When that happens, the
convenient portability will enable podcasts to take a bigger bite
out of radio listening.
Are there any pitfalls?
Two, maybe three:
-
A disproportionate percentage of radio spots are really, really
bad. A lot of small advertisers think that because they can speak
English they can write it, and they script their own spots without
professional help. The more clueless among them do their own
announcing, too. Almost as bad are the free spots written by the
media rep, voiced by a station announcer and mixed with stock
music.
-
People 12 to 24 listen a lot less than anyone else. Just 67% of
those 12-17 and 55% of those 18-26 tune in according to an
Arbitron study. 33% of the 18-24 cohort spend their listening time
with CDs (Still?!) and MP-3s.
-
If the first quarter 2007 numbers are a trend, they could be
worrisome. Although radio lost less than TV or newspaper, the
medium was still down versus the totals (boosted by internet's
16.7% growth), and even behind magazine, which grew 4.4%.
What's going to change?
Four main things that we can foresee:
-
Radio will probably lose a little penetration as podcasts and MP-3
players continue their rapid growth. But the decline probably
won't be too steep. Even the worst-cases industry scenarios
only foresee terrestrial radio penetration falling to 85%.
-
The advent of HD may give radio listening a bounce, since it will
improve audio quality. But like TV, the audience's reluctance to
replace their existing equipment may delay the broad scale
adoption of the format.
-
Clear Channel recently hired an extremely capable creative
director – someone the BrainPosse principals have worked with on
and off for over twenty years – to ratchet up the quality of spots
they write and produce for larger advertisers who don't have
radio-capable agencies. But they obviously can't afford to provide
that service free to small, single-market advertisers. And those
small – or simply penny-wise and pound-foolish – advertisers are
not likely to realize that their total radio program would be a
lot more effective if they shifted a little money away from time
and into creation and production.
-
The incredible variety provided by radio's 47 audited formats will
fragment the radio audience into smaller and smaller niches. The
new Arbitron methodology show advertisers alternatives to achieve
broad market coverage other than market-leader stations.
One thing that doesn't seem likely to change: A significant majority
of people will continue to turn the radio on as soon as they get
into their cars, and listen for every minute of the 15 hours 10
minutes they drive every week. And that means radio will remain an
effective media vehicle until gas prices turn us into a nation of
pedestrians.
Part 1: TV's picture isn't
as bright as it used to be.
Next week:
Newspapers can't paper over their problems much longer.
comment
I back to top I archive I
home
Reader comments:
I think the article is pretty
accurate. I think ipods mainly hurt stations' programming to to
young people. Also, as people are able to program their own music, I
think you will hear more talk formats.
I once read in Advertising Age
that the thing buyers liked about radio was it tied into the local
market. I think we are going to have to really start concentrating
on that again. There are a lot of stations who are tempted to just
ride a satellite feed.They feel it cuts costs, but it also cuts
revenue.
WIVK (largest station in its
market) has had tremendous success mainly for their ability to tune
into this market. Hence, the market tuned into them.
Creativity is definitely something we need to work more on. On
target creativity does help the message sell. On air creativity
helps build audiences.
____
Context is everything. And a
person’s context probably has a strong influence on what s/he tunes
in to at any give point in time. At work, if the radio is on, it’s
simply for background noise. At home in the morning, it’s for
weather and traffic. In the car around town (in a larger city), it’s
for traffic, weather and something to fill the empty sounds of
driving (unless, of course, friends or family are in the vehicle
conversing). On the open road, if s/he is alone, it’s a diversion.
If s/he is a major sports fan, s/he’ll interact with the sports-talk
guys frequently, especially when there are hot sports topics
occurring. Etc.
What does this mean to an
advertiser? Probably it means that the message better do an
extraordinary job of fitting a station’s format and personality, it
better be an extraordinary performer in this theatre of the mind,
and/or it better have a lot of frequency and consistency.
|