A couple of decades ago, advertisers
could reach 80% of adult Americans with a roadblock buy on the
three national networks' evening news shows. A morning-drive
radio buy on a town's top five radio stations could get
near-total penetration if the commercial was interesting enough
to get water-cooler buzz.
Those days are long gone. Cable news networks have
joined national network and local TV news. Local radio now
shares listening time with satellite and podcasts. And as
sources have proliferated, the market has splintered into more
and more small segments. Electronic news media have lost overall
share as news providers. And electronic news audiences are
getting older.
Original post date: 7/28/08
Marketers may have lost a powerful
mass-reach medium. But we've gained an extremely effective
targeting medium.
Broadcast
network TV news
is still the dominant medium for news. The May, 2008
Nielsen study found that 39.6% of adults cite broadcast
news as their primary source of news.
But a Pew study found that 80% of
Americans agree with the statement that "There are so many
ways to get the news these days that I don't worry when I
don't have a chance to read the paper or when I miss my
regular news program." That may be why, although 39.6% of
Americans name broadcast television as their primary
source of news, only 7.7% watch broadcast TV network news
on an average night.
The NBC, ABC and CBS network evening
newscasts lost a combined 1.2 million viewers last year, a
4.9% drop. More troubling, the total audience for
broadcast network evening news is less than half of what
it was 25 years ago.There's a fair chance that their audience is simply
dying off, since the average age of viewers is 60. The
morning shows – "Today," "Good Morning America" and "The
Early News"– are losing audience, too. They're down an
average of 2%, according to the Pew Project for Excellence
in Journalism. (link
here)
Advertising revenues have just begun to
slip. The cumulative decline of the three networks' news
revenues from 2005 to 2007 was $55 million – a drop of
only 3½%. But it's a pretty safe bet that the rate of the
decline will accelerate.
Predictably, network news staffs are
being cut. The Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism
estimates that 10% of network news staffs were cut between
2002 and 2006. More recently, CBS eliminated 160 news jobs
at their corporate-owned TV stations. (Cuts or not, we're
guessing that the $32 million cumulative annual salaries
of Katie Couric, Brian Williams and Charlie Gibson are
safe for the time being.)
Just as is the case with newspapers,
broadcast network TV news staff cuts may be a harbinger of
a death spiral. If the breadth and depth of news is
reduced to headlines and highlights – or maybe just
reading wire-service feeds – viewers might not see much
point in watching. After all, those same headlines,
highlights and feeds are available 24/7 online.
A recent Pew study found that 42% of
national journalists expect broadcast network news to
disappear within ten years. Not just one network's news.
All of them.
Local
broadcast TV news
continues to decline. The same people who aren't watching
broadcast network national news at 6:30 also aren't
watching local broadcast news at 6:00 and 11:00.
Journalism.org's report, "The State of
News Media 2008," notes that local evening and late-night
news ratings were down in 2006 and 2007. The Project for
Excellence in Journalism reports evening news ratings down
6% and late-night new ratings off 7%. Only morning news
held its own, down in 2006 but essentially flat in 2007.
Local broadcast TV news is cited as a
regular news source by 71% of Americans, but local
broadcast TV news shows' ratings are generally low.
According to Pew's "State of the News Media 2008" report,
in the November, 2007 sweeps local morning news ratings
averaged 1.4%, evening news ratings averaged 3.3% and late
news ratings averaged 2.8%.
Like newspapers and broadcast networks,
local stations have cut budgets in prior years. But that
has changed in 2008, as more that half of local stations
report increased newsroom budgets. The extra money isn't
going to better newsgathering and reporting, however. The
increases are for new technology to meet the FCC mandate
for all-digital broadcast in February, 2009. So the
reportage won't be more insightful. It'll just be visually
sharper, since many stations will go to high-def when they
go digital.
Despite declining audiences and the cost
of transitioning to an all-digital environment, local news
operations make a significant contribution to stations'
profitability: 42% of stations' total profit on average.
That ought to be enough incentive for station managers and
their corporate bosses to maintain news departments at
present levels, at least for the time being.
Cable TV news
was cited as the primary source of news by 19.0% of
respondents in the May, 2008, Nielsen study. But cable
news has experienced some bumps in the road.
The primetime cable news audience went
down 8% in 2006, and the daytime audience fell 4%.
In 2007 the cable news networks' numbers
bounced back. They were up 9% in primetime and 1% for
daytime shows. In other words, about right where they had
been two years before in primetime, and 3% off the 2005
mark in daytime.
Fox News, the biggest of the three,
reversed their 2006 decline to grow 2% in primetime in
2007. CNN stopped a ten-year downward trend and grew 4%.
MSNBC's primetime audience grew an eye-popping 36%, albeit
from a much smaller base that Fox and CNN.
Cable news is really three distinct
products:
·News on
demand. Viewers can get headlines and highlights 24/7 on
television sets. Even when total ratings are flat, cable's
cumulative audience is on a steady growth trajectory
because more and more people tune in briefly to catch
headlines. (In other words, more people are watching cable
news, but they're watching fewer times and for shorter
periods.)
This effect is seen in CNN's CNN
Headline News which has grown into a respectable fourth in
the category and may soon be an effective challenger to
MSNBC.
·Big
event coverage. Cable audiences grow significantly during
big events or crises. Things like 9/11, Katrina and the
Democratic primaries draw audiences to cable's
'round-the-clock, on-the-spot coverage.
·
Opinionated personalities. Fox News pretty much owns this
category. According to Journalism.org's State of the News
Media 2007 report, Fox has nine of the top ten shows. Only
CNN's "Larry King Live" prevented a clean sweep for Fox's
"fair and balanced" opinion meisters.
Since the audiences of these shows tend
to be very faithful, no significant swings seem likely.
They'll keep pulling the same true believers every night.
That consistency of audience means anything beyond a
couple of commercials a month might be a waste of media
dollars. (See our earlier article, "How
many times do I have to tell you?")
Cable will almost certainly have a
strong third quarter 2008, because it is many people's
default choice for big-event news. But when the broadcast
networks go to full-time coverage on the evening of
November 4th, NBC, ABC and CBS are likely to
grab back a major piece of the audience.
Radio news
can be a weather and traffic report every half hour or a
day of news talk. Since many studies lump news talk into a
single category, it can be difficult to separate true news
programs from Don Imus' vile spewing or Rush Limbaugh's
rants.
Two important numbers: 11.1% of
respondents in the May, 2008 Nielsen study cite radio as
their primary source of news, but only 6.4% cite radio as
their first source for local weather, traffic and sports
information. That's a pretty good indication that
personality-opinion shows may be a significant part of
radio "news" listening.
Overall, news programming has a 16.1% of
total radio listeners in 2007. The breakdown by categories
was:
·All
news: 1.4%
·
Talk/personality: 2.1%
·All
sports: 2.2%
·Mixed
format (news/talk/information): 10.4%
News/talk radio has a slowly declining
share of radio's large – but also slowly declining –
audience. An important demographic factor may have a
significant impact in the near future: listeners 65 and
older account for just under 30% of news talk radio's
audience. The 55-64 and 50-54 cohorts are close behind.
Together, those three groups account for almost two-thirds
of news talk radio's audience. Like broadcast TV news and
newspaper, radio news won't be losing audience to other
media so much as to the grim reaper.
Radio news advertising revenues are off
a little. About 1% from 2005 to 2006. The slight downward
trend continues, but the decline is relatively slight.
For now Rush Limbaugh's 13.5 million
listeners are almost double the audience of the
highest-rated TV broadcast network news show. That kind of
reach gives news talk radio a fairly secure near-term
future.
Last week we saw that print news media
are having serious problems. This week's article points
out that electronic news media range from slipping a bit
(broadcast network and local TV news) to barely holding
their own (cable news networks and radio news). Next week
we'll look at digital news.
So what are the marketing opportunities
in electronic news media? Targeting for age, first and
foremost.
·Selling
meds for osteoporosis, blood pressure, constipation or
amorous dysfunctions? Electronic news can deliver your
target audience without a lot of waste.
·
Retirement income investments and annuities are natural
fits for the 60+ viewers and listeners of electronic news.
·
Medicare Advantage coverage and burial insurance are
practical needs for this group.
·Buicks.
·And, of
course, any product, service or candidate with an appeal
to conservative people. Because news talk radio and Fox
News can deliver an audience of true believers.
To find out how to make the changes in
news media work for your company,
click here, or call BrainPosse at 865-330-0033.
Next week: digital news – hot, but not as hot as you might
think.